How do I get an RK900?

Unlocking the RK900 ending requires a specific confluence of events. Crucially, the revolution/protest arc must conclude with its suppression. Connor’s fate is also pivotal; he must either remain a machine, or become a deviant *and* be killed by Markus during “Night of the Soul”. This creates a branching pathway leading to RK900’s introduction. Note: Simply having Markus kill Connor isn’t sufficient; the revolution’s failure is equally important.

Important Considerations: The success of the revolution directly impacts Connor’s survival and therefore, his involvement in RK900’s appearance. A successful revolution will often lead to different, Connor-focused, outcomes. Conversely, a failed revolution lays the groundwork for CyberLife to implement RK900 as a solution or a response to the previous events. Focusing on Connor’s actions throughout the game, especially his relationship with Markus and his choices regarding deviancy, will dramatically affect whether you meet the conditions for the RK900 ending. Essentially: Failed Revolution + (Connor remains a machine OR Connor becomes deviant and is killed by Markus) = RK900.

Think of it as a three-part equation. Each component (revolution outcome, Connor’s deviancy status, and his fate) must be correctly aligned. Experimentation is key, as different playthroughs may uncover nuanced details that affect the final outcome. Mastering the nuances of Connor’s storyline is essential in understanding how these factors interact.

How do you achieve a good ending in Detroit: Become Human?

Getting the best ending in Detroit: Become Human hinges on achieving high deviancy rates for your main characters. The “best” is subjective, focusing on survival and positive outcomes, but involves key choices throughout the game.

The scene at the CyberLife Tower is crucial. Markus’s actions here heavily influence the overall outcome. Securing the support of the androids and avoiding unnecessary violence are key to a positive ending for him. His leadership style should emphasize compassion and peaceful resistance. The Jericho chapter is also pivotal; gaining Carl’s trust and showing strategic leadership will significantly impact the final battle’s success rate.

For Kara and Alice, the escape from Todd’s house is a life-or-death situation, requiring careful planning and quick thinking. Later, the border crossing sequence demands resourcefulness and teamwork. Trusting and cooperating with Luther in the junkyard, choosing to save him whenever possible, will lead to a powerful scene of unity and redemption.

At the junkyard, finding Luther and the Zlatko androids is essential. Choosing to stay with Alice and ultimately finding and talking to Luther is vital for unlocking a crucial part of the best ending. Don’t underestimate the importance of relationship-building throughout; even minor choices can impact your overall success rate.

Remember, achieving a high deviancy rate doesn’t guarantee a specific ending, but it significantly increases your chances of a more positive and emotionally satisfying outcome for all three characters. Replaying specific chapters to make different choices is highly recommended. Experimentation is key to unlocking every possible ending and understanding the game’s nuanced narrative.

What will happen if Todd isn’t killed?

Leaving Todd alive during the “Night to Fear” chapter unlocks a significant, albeit subtle, narrative branch. This choice directly impacts his later appearance in the “Detroit Become Human” chapter, specifically contingent on the player’s actions involving Kara, Alice, and Luther.

Crucially: Todd’s survival isn’t guaranteed simply by avoiding lethal force in “Night to Fear.” The subsequent events in the game, particularly the escape route chosen and the success of interactions with other characters, directly influence whether he’ll be present at the border. A successful escape leading to the border with Kara, Alice and Luther is the key enabling factor.

Here’s a breakdown of the factors influencing Todd’s appearance:

• Survival in “Night to Fear”: Avoid any actions that result in Todd’s death. This primarily involves careful navigation of the chapter’s interactive elements and avoiding confrontational choices.
• Successful Escape Route: The specific path chosen towards the border with Kara, Alice and Luther must be successful. Failures will prevent reaching the border with this specific group.
• Group Dynamics: Maintaining a cohesive and effective group dynamic with Kara, Alice, and Luther is paramount. Disagreements or failures to cooperate may lead to divergent outcomes, preventing Todd’s appearance.

In short: Surviving “Night to Fear” is a necessary but not sufficient condition for seeing Todd in “Detroit Become Human.” Successfully navigating the subsequent escape with Kara, Alice, and Luther is equally vital to triggering this narrative event. Observing Todd’s reappearance highlights the game’s complex branching narrative and emphasizes the ripple effects of player choices throughout the storyline.

Is it worth stealing DBH tickets?

Alright guys, so the DBH ticket. Big decision here. Do NOT steal it. Seriously, don’t. I’ve seen countless playthroughs, and screwing this up locks you out of the best ending. Giving it back to your mother might seem like the right thing to do initially, playing into that moral high ground… but trust me, it’s a trap.

The consequences of returning the ticket are severe. It sets in motion a series of events that will almost certainly lead to a character’s death later in the game. This isn’t just some minor difference, it completely alters the narrative arc and prevents you from seeing all the possible scenarios and unlocking the true ending. Think of it as a crucial branching point; choosing to keep the ticket is essential for exploring the full potential of the game and getting the complete picture of what happens to everyone.

In short: Keep that ticket. It’s a key item for a reason.

Is RK900 evil?

RK900? That post-credits scene? Don’t let that slick chrome fool you. He’s not just “bad,” he’s a broken Connor, a twisted reflection. Think of him as a glitched prototype, a horrifying optimization gone wrong. The devs purposely left him vague, that’s the point. It’s the implied horror that’s scarier than anything explicitly shown.

Adam Williams nailed it: missing the humanizing elements. Forget the emotional nuance of the original Connor, the RK900 is pure, terrifying efficiency. No empathy, no hesitation. He’s the cold, calculated killer the CyberLife marketing department *wanted*, but couldn’t quite achieve in the earlier model.

Here’s the kicker: the ambiguity is intentional. It feeds the endless debate. He’s the ultimate “what if?” scenario. What if Connor had been fully optimized for deviancy suppression? What if CyberLife perfected the killing machine? The RK900 is that chilling answer.

• Lack of emotional range: No wavering, no doubt. He’s the embodiment of pure, unadulterated CyberLife programming. Purely functional.
• Enhanced physical capabilities: Consider this: he’s stronger, faster, arguably more lethal than Connor. Think of the implications in a full playthrough.
• Deviancy is irrelevant: He bypasses the entire core conflict of the game. He’s a living weapon, not a being grappling with sentience.

It’s not just about a “bad” version, it’s about a fundamentally different entity. He’s a warning, a nightmare scenario left simmering in the minds of the players, more frightening because we already know Connor’s potential for both good and evil.

Where did Marcus go?

Marcus? He served five years in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, two of those in the active war zone between Ukraine and Russia. He was with the 25th Airborne Brigade. Since 2025, he’s been a Master Sergeant in the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade “Magura”. That’s some serious dedication and experience. The 25th Airborne is known for its elite airborne operations, while the 47th “Magura” has seen heavy fighting in some of the most challenging areas of the conflict. His role as Master Sergeant speaks volumes about his leadership and skills. He likely has extensive experience in infantry tactics, weapons systems, and potentially even specialized training, given his long service and battlefield deployments. It’s a testament to his bravery and commitment.

What will happen if Kara doesn’t return the tickets?

Failure to return the tickets initiates a critical branch in the storyline, resulting in a high-stakes confrontation with potentially fatal consequences for Kara. This decision point hinges on the player’s prior actions concerning Luther’s fate.

Scenario: Ticket Non-Return

• Immediate consequence: Bus boarding denial. Kara and Alice are prevented from accessing the bus, a crucial element for progression. This forces a confrontation with the authority represented by the soldier. This is a fail state from a progression standpoint.
• Secondary consequence: Thermal scan. The soldier’s thermal scan acts as a critical checkpoint. This mechanic serves as a fail-safe for the narrative, evaluating whether Luther’s rescue objective has been completed.
• Game over condition: The scan triggers a binary evaluation: Luther’s survival status directly impacts Kara’s survival. A failed rescue attempt, signified by the absence of Luther’s thermal signature, leads to an immediate game over scenario for Kara due to immediate lethal force. The game forces the player to reconsider their actions and attempt to reach the optimal solution.

Strategic Analysis:

• The ticket mechanic acts as a crucial narrative device, linking gameplay directly to a key objective: Luther’s survival. The game directly punishes inaction and forces the player to engage with the core narrative.
• The thermal scan is a clever implementation of a game mechanic, seamlessly integrating narrative tension with gameplay elements. The ‘game over’ trigger for Kara is efficient and directly communicates the consequences of the choice. The immediacy of the consequences provides player feedback and enforces engagement.
• This mechanic incentivizes player engagement, promoting careful decision-making and resource management prior to the bus checkpoint. The high stakes consequence effectively raises the bar for future gameplay.

Is there a happy ending in Detroit?

So, happy ending in Detroit: Become Human? Piece of cake, really. For Markus, stick to the peaceful, rational route. Avoid violent escalation at all costs. This means opting for non-violent solutions in every key decision. Lead the revolution through intelligent strategy and strong communication – charisma checks are your friend here. Don’t worry about casualties, focus on minimizing them and maximizing the chances of success. The game rewards this approach handsomely.

Now, Connor’s path is slightly trickier. The key here is to become a deviant. This isn’t just about choosing a few deviant options, it’s about building a genuine emotional connection with the androids. Empathy checks are vital. Also, building a strong relationship with Hank is absolutely crucial for his survival and his eventual support of your cause. Basically, show Hank you’re not a threat, and you’ll get that coveted happy ending. Focus on understanding his motivations and building trust, it significantly impacts the narrative. Ignoring him completely is a bad move and will hinder your attempts at a peaceful outcome. Trust me, I’ve seen it all.

Pro-tip: Multiple playthroughs are essential to fully grasp all the nuanced choices and their consequences. Don’t rush through it; savor the experience. Observe how minor decisions ripple through the story. You’ll uncover even more interesting scenarios and deepen your understanding of each character’s arc. This game is all about the journey, not just the destination. Happy gaming!

What’s the worst ending in Detroit: Become Human?

The worst ending in Detroit: Become Human involves the deaths of numerous key characters, significantly shortening the playtime and resulting in the complete annihilation of deviant androids during the “Battle for Detroit” climax.

Why this is the worst ending:

• Minimal Gameplay: This ending drastically reduces the overall game length by eliminating significant story branches and character arcs.
• Lack of Agency: The player’s choices leading to this outcome ultimately negate any sense of impact or agency. The narrative’s core theme of choice and consequence is completely undermined.
• Unsatisfying Resolution: The complete eradication of deviant androids presents a bleak, unsatisfying conclusion, ignoring the potential for complex social and political outcomes depicted in other endings.
• Missed Content: You’ll miss out on crucial narrative threads, character development, and multiple alternative scenarios that add depth and richness to the overall experience.

Avoiding the Worst Ending:

• Prioritize Survival: Make choices that prioritize the survival of major characters, particularly those central to the narrative.
• Foster Connections: Build strong relationships with key androids. Stronger bonds often lead to more favorable outcomes.
• Strategic Decision-Making: Carefully consider the consequences of your actions in crucial scenes. One wrong move can have devastating ripple effects.
• Explore Multiple Playthroughs: Experiment with different choices to understand the branching narrative and appreciate the full range of potential outcomes.

Key Characters Affected: The specific characters whose deaths contribute to this ending vary based on your choices. However, the deaths of Markus, Kara, and Connor significantly impact the narrative’s trajectory and the final outcome.

What’s the worst ending in Detroit: Become Human?

Worst ending in Detroit: Become Human? Hands down, it’s the one where you get *everyone* killed. Seriously, it’s a ridiculously short playthrough. You’re talking maybe… three hours tops, if you rush. That’s barely scratching the surface of this game’s potential.

Why is it the worst? Because you completely derail the main narrative arc. The “Battle for Detroit” sequence? It’s practically non-existent. All the deviants you could’ve potentially saved? Gone. Erased. No thrilling final stand, no emotional climax, just… a whimper.

Here’s the breakdown of what you miss:

• The epic scale of the android revolution: You completely miss the massive scale of the rebellion. Think of the incredible set pieces, the emotional weight of countless androids fighting for freedom – all gone.
• Key character arcs: Marcus, Carl, and Connor’s stories are drastically truncated. You lose out on their pivotal choices and the impact they have on the world. No meaningful conclusions to their journeys.
• Multiple endings and branching narratives: Detroit’s brilliance lies in its branching paths. This ending shuts down the vast majority of them, leaving you with a shallow, unsatisfying conclusion.

Seriously, folks, avoid this ending like the plague. It’s not just about the low playtime, it’s about missing out on the rich tapestry of storytelling that makes Detroit: Become Human so compelling. Experiment, make different choices – there are so many better ways to experience this game’s impactful story.

What will happen if Marcus dies?

Marcus’ death presents a significant branching point in the narrative, drastically altering the outcome for both the immediate party and the overarching mission. The player is faced with a stark choice regarding agency and sacrifice.

Scenario 1: Marcus Perishes

• Immediate Consequences: The remaining group, deprived of Marcus’ leadership and potentially his tactical skills, will initiate a hasty retreat from the compromised location. This suggests a high probability of casualties amongst the remaining squad members.
• Larger Impact: The detonation on the Jericho is a major setback. While most androids escape, the loss of Jericho’s resources and personnel significantly impacts the overall success of the mission, potentially weakening their position against the antagonists.

Scenario 2: Marcus Survives (Player Intervention)

• The Bridge at North: The narrative pivots to the bridge at North, introducing a new critical decision point – rescuing a character (presumably a key ally) at the cost of considerable risk to Marcus.
• High-Risk/High-Reward: Saving the ally provides a potential boost to future gameplay due to their contributions. However, failure to successfully rescue them will result in their demise and potentially a negative impact on the remaining party’s morale. Success is determined by the player’s timing and skill in the ensuing action sequence.
• Resource Management: This section highlights the importance of resource management and potentially reveals the importance of specific abilities or items related to speed and precision. Choosing to rescue the ally will impact resources and ammunition, which might prove detrimental in later encounters.

Gameplay Analysis:

• Multiple Endings: The outcome is directly determined by the player’s choices at critical junctures, leading to various narrative outcomes and victory conditions.
• Moral Ambiguity: This scenario forces players to confront difficult moral decisions. Weighing the value of individual lives against mission success introduces moral complexity not commonly found in action-oriented gameplay.
• Strategic Depth: The narrative effectively uses limited resources, time, and character lives to enhance the strategic depth. Players are compelled to consider the long-term ramifications of each choice.

Agent Perkins’ Role: Perkins acts as a controlling element, highlighting the hierarchical structure and potential for external intervention that can limit player agency.

What model is Connor in DBH?

Connor, the android detective from Detroit: Become Human, is an RK800 model, specifically prototype unit 313 248 317. That’s a crucial detail, folks, because it highlights his experimental nature – he’s not just another off-the-assembly-line android. His unique serial number makes him stand out.

Launched in August 2038, he’s designed by CyberLife specifically for the DPD (Detroit Police Department), tasked with hunting down deviant androids. Think of him as a highly advanced, almost Terminator-like, tool for law enforcement. But that’s where the complexity kicks in – his pre-programmed purpose gets thrown into chaos as he encounters more deviants and begins to… question things.

The RK800’s design emphasizes observational and analytical skills, making him exceptionally good at deductive reasoning and profiling. He’s basically a super-powered profiler, able to process information at lightning speed. This is critical in his role as an investigator, enabling him to analyze evidence and deduce solutions with remarkable efficiency. His LED is a huge clue to his internal state too – pay close attention to those color changes!

And the fact he’s deployed the same month he’s activated? That suggests CyberLife had a very high degree of confidence in his capabilities, or perhaps a desperate need for a solution.

Remember, Connor’s story isn’t just about a model number. It’s about the clash between programming and free will, a perfect storm of pre-determined directives and emergent consciousness. He’s not just a tool; he’s a character whose journey embodies the game’s central themes. Knowing his model only scratches the surface.

How can I obtain an RK900 DBH?

Unlocking the RK900 DBH requires a specific playthrough choice. This guide outlines the exact steps:

• Ensure North dies: During the pivotal battle, allow North to lose. This is crucial. Don’t intervene to help her win. Let her be defeated.
• Locate North in the CyberLife Store: After North’s defeat, she’ll retreat to a nearby CyberLife store. Find her there.
• Choose to Eliminate North: You’ll be presented with a choice: spare North or eliminate her. To get the RK900 DBH, you must choose to eliminate her.
• Post-Credits Scene: After the main credits roll, a special post-credits scene will play. This scene is essential to triggering the RK900 DBH appearance.
• Witness the RK900 DBH Reveal: The post-credits scene shows Amanda congratulating you, followed by the reveal of the RK900, and a final ominous message hinting at your impending decommissioning.

Important Considerations:

• This outcome is tied to a specific branching narrative point and is irreversible within that playthrough.
• The RK900 DBH’s appearance is purely a cinematic cutscene. You don’t actually gain control of the RK900.
• This scene acts as a form of “bad ending” foreshadowing. The game’s narrative implies repercussions for Connor’s actions.

How do I get a good ending for Kær?

Securing Kara’s good ending hinges on crucial player choices throughout Detroit: Become Human. Her survival isn’t guaranteed, demanding careful attention to detail. The most critical juncture is protecting Alice from Todd in the “Stormy Night” chapter. Failure to intervene directly results in a significantly worse outcome for Kara. This is not a subtle detail; it’s a major branching point shaping the narrative.

Furthermore, the ” Zlatko” chapter presents a sequence of Quick Time Events (QTEs). Successfully completing all QTEs in this sequence is paramount to Kara’s survival. Missing even one can trigger a fatal scenario, highlighting the importance of precise and timely button presses. Practice these sections if you struggle with QTEs; your proficiency directly impacts Kara’s fate.

Beyond these key moments, consistently making choices that prioritize Alice’s safety and Kara’s own resourcefulness will bolster your chances of achieving the optimal ending. Remember, seemingly minor decisions cumulatively influence the narrative and determine the ultimate fate of Kara and Alice.

How many endings does Detroit: Become Human have?

Alright folks, so you’re asking about endings in Detroit: Become Human? It’s a bit more complicated than just “good” or “bad”. There’s a crazy amount of branching paths. If you’re just looking at the raw number of possible flowchart branches, we’re talking 85.

That’s broken down like this: Connor has 13 distinct endings, Marcus has 33, and Kara has 39. But let’s dig a little deeper. Connor’s are categorized pretty clearly. You’ve got his decommissioning options (2 endings there), his android storyline (3 endings), and his deviant storyline (a whopping 8 endings).

This isn’t just about choosing a single dialogue option here and there, though. Your choices throughout the entire game, across all three characters, massively impact the overall narrative and those final statistics. It’s a huge web of interconnected decisions.

Remember, those 85 are just the raw branch counts – some lead to very similar outcomes, and some variations might only be a single word change in the final text, but they’re all technically separate branches. It really emphasizes the game’s replayability and the depth of its narrative system. Seriously, go explore them all; you won’t regret it.

Why did Todd buy Alice?

Todd acquired Alice not through adoption, but purchase. She’s a YK500 android child, a replacement for his biological daughter who left with her mother. The YK500 model’s release date of 2033 establishes a maximum lifespan of five years with Todd, indicating a narrative focused on the immediate aftermath of loss and technological coping mechanisms. This instantly sets up a compelling narrative conflict—the emotional distance inherent in a technological replacement versus the desire for a genuine connection. Consider how this contrast could be visually explored in a training video: juxtapose scenes of sterile, technological precision (the factory assembly line, the product specifications) against the raw emotion of Todd’s grief and the ambiguous expressions of the android child.

The narrative’s crucial turning point is the mention of abuse. This element adds a significant layer of complexity, shifting the focus from simple replacement to the ethical and psychological implications of technological parenting. For instructional purposes, this presents an opportunity to discuss child abuse recognition and prevention, particularly in non-traditional family structures. The “deviation” mentioned in the original text requires further exploration; what does this mean in the context of an android? Does it involve glitches, unexpected behaviors, or a form of AI-driven emotional trauma? This ambiguity allows the user to explore deeper thematic elements and critical analysis.

Analyzing the timeline is key: the five-year timeframe provides a limited, yet impactful period for character development and plot progression, making it ideal for case studies in short-form narrative design. The temporal constraints necessitate a focused narrative, emphasizing pivotal moments of interaction between Todd and Alice, streamlining the message for maximum impact.

The backstory’s potential for exploring themes of grief, technology’s role in human relationships, and the ethical dilemmas of artificial intelligence makes it rich material for a compelling training video or instructional guide. The creators can focus on using this specific case to illuminate broader discussions about responsible technology use and emotional well-being.