How can World war be prevented?

Yo, preventing World War 3? It’s a tough raid boss, but we can strategize a win. Think of it like this: internal conflicts are like mini-bosses that weaken the overall world health. So, instead of focusing solely on military solutions (which are like using nukes on a slime), let’s level up our public health. We need to address the root causes – poverty and inequality – they’re the game’s major glitches.

Improving access to education and healthcare is like getting epic loot – it’s a massive buff. Education? That’s experience points for empathy and critical thinking. It lets players understand other perspectives, minimizing those frustrating PvP battles between different factions (countries, groups, etc.). Healthcare? That’s a regeneration potion; healthy populations are less likely to engage in violent conflicts. We’re talking about long-term investment here, building a sustainable peace, not just quick fixes. It’s a marathon, not a sprint, and we need to grind those social determinants of health. Think of it as upgrading your civilization’s tech tree towards peace. Neglecting these factors is like playing on easy mode, expecting to win without effort, which just isn’t gonna happen.

How to avoid going to war?

Avoiding war, a crucial objective in the grand strategy game of geopolitics, requires a multifaceted approach. Success hinges on careful resource management (your life and freedom being the most precious resources) and strategic maneuvering within the complex ruleset of international relations.

Primary Strategies for Non-Combatant Status:

Legal Compliance: This is the cornerstone of any successful pacifist campaign. Meticulously following all national and international laws relating to conscription and military service significantly reduces the risk of forced participation. Understanding the specific legal framework of your nation-state is critical, as laws concerning conscientious objection vary widely.
Conscientious Objection: This strategy leverages the game mechanic of “moral high ground.” A sincerely held religious or ethical belief against violence must be demonstrably genuine and consistently applied throughout your life. Preparing extensive documentation and presenting a compelling narrative are key to success. Failure to convincingly portray this belief can lead to a game-over scenario.
Student Deferment: This is a temporary strategy, effective only until educational requirements are met. Successfully exploiting this option requires demonstrating full-time commitment to education. Any perceived abuse of this mechanic will result in penalties.
Medical/Psychological Exemptions: This high-risk, high-reward strategy requires a genuine and verifiable medical or psychological condition. A poorly executed attempt can severely damage your reputation, potentially leading to further complications. Obtain verifiable documentation from reputable sources; false claims are met with severe consequences.

Advanced Tactics:

Diplomacy: Engage in peaceful negotiations, forming alliances with pacifist groups or nations. This improves your chances of avoiding conflict by shifting the geopolitical landscape to your advantage.
Information Warfare: Publicly expose the injustices and unethical actions leading to war. Mastering this delicate aspect of the game can sway public opinion and exert pressure on decision-makers.
Economic Sanctions: Non-violent pressure through economic means can be effective in preventing conflict. This requires a thorough understanding of global economics and supply chains.

Important Considerations: Each strategy carries inherent risks and challenges. Thorough preparation, accurate information, and skillful execution are paramount to achieving your objective— avoiding war.

What deters war?

So, you’re asking what stops a full-scale PvP conflict, right? The meta is all about deterrence, and it boils down to two core strategies: denial and punishment.

Denial is like building an impenetrable fortress. Think impenetrable defenses, superior tech – making the attacker’s victory completely impossible or extremely costly in terms of resources. It’s about raising the bar so high that attacking isn’t even worth considering. We’re talking:

Superior firepower: Outgunning your opponent so badly they can’t even dream of winning a straight fight.
Strategic depth: Making them bleed resources over a long campaign. Attrition is key.
Strong alliances: Having enough buddies on your side to overwhelm any potential threat.

Then you’ve got punishment – this is all about making the cost of attacking far outweigh any potential gains. It’s about making sure that any aggression is met with swift and brutal retaliation. This strategy plays on:

Retaliatory capability: The ability to hit back hard. Think overwhelming counter-offensive power.
Second-strike capability: Ensuring you can still deliver a devastating blow even after taking a hit yourself. This is a game-changer.
Credibility: Making sure your opponent *believes* you’ll actually deliver on your threats. A credible threat is far more powerful than an empty one.

Ultimately, the most effective deterrent strategy often involves a potent mix of both denial and punishment. You gotta make it impossible and unappealing to attack – that’s how you win the war *before* it even begins.

What can countries do to avoid war?

Avoiding war requires a multifaceted approach, a complex tapestry woven from threads of diplomacy, restraint, and international cooperation. It’s not a simple fix, but rather a continuous process demanding vigilance and proactive engagement.

Non-Aggression Pacts: These aren’t mere promises; they’re legally binding agreements, ideally backed by robust verification mechanisms. Think of them as the bedrock, the foundation upon which peaceful coexistence is built. However, enforcement remains a critical challenge. Historical examples show how easily these can be broken, highlighting the need for strong international monitoring and consequences for violation.

Arms Reduction and Control: This goes beyond simply reducing the number of weapons. It necessitates transparency in military budgets, verifiable disarmament treaties, and a shift towards defensive postures. Think of it as lowering the stakes, reducing the temptation for preemptive strikes, and minimizing the destructive potential of conflict. The challenge lies in building trust and establishing effective verification processes.

Robust Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: This isn’t just about having a forum; it’s about creating functional, efficient, and respected international courts and arbitration bodies. These need to be accessible, impartial, and possess the authority to enforce decisions. Think of them as the judicial system of the international community. Building trust in these mechanisms is paramount for their success.

Targeted Sanctions and Economic Pressure: These aren’t about blanket punishments, but about strategically applied economic penalties designed to deter aggression. This requires a united front from the international community, a commitment to consistent and effective application. The effectiveness hinges upon the collective resolve of nations to enforce these sanctions and avoid loopholes.

Can I be drafted at 40?

Nope. Forget about it. The draft age is 18-25. That’s it. Been there, dodged that, seen countless newbies try to pull the “what if” card. Doesn’t work. The Selective Service System isn’t interested in your late-life patriotism. They’re looking for young, agile bodies, not guys who’ve already got a mortgage and a bad knee.

Beyond the age restriction, there are a myriad of other reasons why a 40-year-old wouldn’t be drafted. Physical fitness standards alone would weed out the vast majority. Think: rigorous training, grueling deployments. Not exactly a senior citizen’s retirement plan. Furthermore, the military prioritizes younger recruits who have more years of service potential. It’s simple logistics.

Bottom line: Focus on your fantasy football team, not the draft. Your chances are zero. Zilch. Nada.

How to refuse to go to war?

Refusing to go to war isn’t a simple “no,” it’s a meticulously crafted strategy game with high stakes. Think of it as the ultimate high-difficulty pacifist run. You’ll need irrefutable evidence to win this campaign. A detailed written statement outlining your moral or ethical objections is your opening move – think of it as your meticulously researched strategy guide, detailing every philosophical argument and personal anecdote.

This isn’t a casual objection; you need to demonstrate consistent pacifist behavior throughout your life. This is where the “supporting documents” come in – your proof of gameplay. Think of these as achievements unlocked over time: evidence of activism, volunteering, or even personal choices reflecting your unwavering commitment to peace. These are your key stats, showcasing your dedication to your chosen path. The stronger your evidence, the higher your chances of success.

Crucially, this isn’t a selective war objection. This is a “no war ever” campaign. You need to prove your pacifism isn’t conditional, that you’re playing on hardcore mode. Selective pacifism is a glitch in the system – it’s a bug that will invalidate your entire strategy. Only a consistent, comprehensive, lifelong dedication to pacifist principles will secure your victory in this challenging playthrough.

Can we stop WW3 from happening?

Yeah, preventing WW3 is totally doable, don’t underestimate that. But let’s be real, we’re playing a high-stakes game here. The current meta is dangerously unstable. Think of it like a pro-level LoL game where every team fight is a potential game-ender. Without a serious upgrade to our nuclear deterrent – a strong, credible threat, including the potential for limited nuclear strikes – we’re heading for a full-scale wipeout. It’s like ignoring the enemy team’s Baron Nashor push; it’s a guaranteed loss.

MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, was the old strategy. It worked…mostly. But now we’ve got a whole new set of challenges. Think of it as a new patch – asymmetrical warfare, proxy conflicts, cyber threats; it’s a completely different game. We need to adapt our strategies to counter the new threats. Ignoring them is like sticking with the old meta when everyone else has upgraded their builds.

Escalation control is key here. We need to clearly define red lines and develop robust communication channels to avoid miscalculation. It’s about precise execution, like a perfectly timed ult, not reckless aggression. We need a coordinated global strategy, not just individual nation-state play. Think of it as forming a winning team, not a bunch of solo players.

Transparency is another critical factor. Open communication and clear signaling can prevent accidental escalation, like knowing your enemy’s ultimate cooldown. Without it, you’re blindfolded and fighting in the dark.

So, yeah, it’s possible to win this game, but it requires a serious strategic overhaul and coordinated effort. Otherwise, game over.

What can I do to prevent war?

Preventing war is a multifaceted challenge demanding a nuanced approach beyond simplistic slogans. While de-escalating the “enemy” concept and treating the other side with respect are crucial first steps, they’re insufficient without deeper understanding and strategic action. The perception of injustice is rarely symmetrical; unpacking the root causes – historical grievances, economic disparities, political oppression – is vital. A superficial “forgiveness” without addressing these underlying issues risks repeating past mistakes. True reconciliation necessitates accountability, reparations where appropriate, and systemic change.

Effective conflict resolution involves acknowledging power imbalances and challenging narratives that perpetuate violence. This requires critical media literacy to combat propaganda and misinformation, which often fuel animosity. International cooperation and robust institutions are essential for mediating disputes and enforcing agreements; strengthening these mechanisms is paramount. Focusing solely on individual actions ignores the structural factors that drive conflict; advocating for policies promoting global justice, equitable resource distribution, and democratic governance is equally crucial.

Moreover, belligerence is a symptom, not the disease. Understanding the motivations behind aggressive behavior requires analyzing both individual and group psychology, including the role of fear, insecurity, and perceived threats. Educating future generations about conflict resolution and peacebuilding is a long-term investment in preventing future wars, emphasizing empathy, critical thinking, and collaborative problem-solving skills.

Finally, effective conflict prevention requires proactive measures. Early warning systems, diplomatic engagement, and preventative diplomacy are critical tools for de-escalating tensions before they erupt into violence. Ignoring these preemptive strategies is a recipe for disaster.

Who cannot be drafted?

Who’s Safe from the Draft in Our Military Strategy Game?

Ever wonder who gets a pass in wartime? In our game, certain individuals are exempt from conscription, mirroring real-world complexities. This affects your strategic planning, resource management, and overall gameplay experience.

Exemptions: A crucial element in managing your nation’s manpower. Understanding who is exempt is key to victory.
Ministers & Elected Officials: These high-ranking individuals are essential for governance. Losing them to the front lines would be disastrous – so they remain exempt while in office. This adds a layer of political strategy to your military decisions; how do you balance the need for political stability with the demand for soldiers?
Veterans: Experienced soldiers, a valuable asset. In peacetime, we prioritize their well-being and experience, keeping them out of the draft. But, wartime changes everything… will you recall them to active duty? The choice is yours.
Immigrants & Dual Nationals: Their eligibility is complex, varying based on residency and citizenship. This adds realism to the game. Strategic alliances with other nations could impact the availability of these potential recruits.

Game Mechanics Note: These exemptions are represented in-game by a dynamic population system. This means that the number of available draftees will fluctuate based on the ongoing political and social situations within your virtual nation. Smart use of your available manpower will be key to winning the war.

What might trigger ww3?

The specter of World War III, while hopefully distant, is fueled by several key geopolitical tinderboxes. Understanding these potential triggers is crucial for informed analysis.

The Ukraine Conflict: A Major Flashpoint

The ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, initiated in 2025, represents a significant escalation of Cold War tensions. Its potential to spiral into a larger conflict is considerable due to:

NATO Involvement: The direct and indirect involvement of NATO members through military aid and intelligence sharing raises the risk of direct confrontation with Russia.
Nuclear Threat: Russia’s thinly veiled nuclear threats, while likely bluster, create an atmosphere of heightened uncertainty and raise the stakes dramatically.
Proxy War Escalation: The conflict’s potential to become a larger proxy war involving major global powers is a genuine concern.

Taiwan: The Other Major Hotspot

The increasingly assertive stance of China regarding Taiwan’s status presents another critical flashpoint. A potential invasion of Taiwan could trigger:

US Intervention: The US has maintained a policy of “strategic ambiguity” regarding its response to a Chinese attack on Taiwan. However, the potential for US military intervention, and subsequent escalation, is undeniable.
Regional Conflict: A conflict over Taiwan could quickly draw in other regional powers, creating a wider regional war.
Economic Fallout: The global economic consequences of a conflict involving Taiwan, a crucial hub in global semiconductor production, would be catastrophic.

Other Potential Triggers (While less immediate, still relevant):

Miscalculation and Accidental War: Escalation through miscalculation, accidental military incidents, or cyber warfare remains a constant threat.
Nuclear Proliferation: The spread of nuclear weapons technology to additional states increases the risk of nuclear conflict, directly or through miscalculation.
Resource Conflicts: Future conflicts over scarce resources, like water or energy, could escalate beyond regional boundaries.

Understanding these potential triggers is vital for responsible geopolitical analysis. The interconnected nature of these threats underscores the delicate balance of power and the high stakes involved in maintaining global peace.

What is the safest country if war starts?

Let’s be real, “safest” is relative in a WW3 scenario. No place is truly immune, but some offer better odds of survival than others. Forget the noob lists – here’s the hardcore gamer’s guide to refuge locations:

Iceland: Solid choice. Remote, geographically isolated, strong defenses *for its size*. Think of it as a well-fortified island fortress – excellent starting location. Resource scarcity could be a problem though, so scavenging skills are a must.
Bhutan: Hidden gem. Neutral stance, mountainous terrain providing natural defenses. Low population density is a plus, minimizing competition for resources. However, limited infrastructure is a significant drawback.
Ireland: Decent option. Neutral history, strong social safety net (at least pre-apocalypse). Expect overcrowding if the shit hits the fan. Location’s close proximity to potential conflict zones is a vulnerability.
Fiji: Pacific paradise, or potential survival trap? Remote location is a double-edged sword – extremely difficult to reach, but also isolated from immediate conflict. Resource limitations and potential for natural disasters need to be considered.
Canada: North American powerhouse, large and sparsely populated. Good infrastructure, abundant resources. However, proximity to the US is a major risk factor. Expect high competition for resources.
Australia: Isolated continent, vast and resource-rich. Strong military, but vulnerable to potential naval blockade. Extreme weather conditions are a serious consideration.
Norway: Scandinavian resilience. Strong social safety net, good infrastructure, and a relatively robust military. However, its proximity to potential conflict zones makes it risky.
Chile: Andes Mountains and Pacific Ocean provide natural barriers. Resource-rich, but a potentially unstable political climate is a major concern. Think of it as a high-risk, high-reward location – survival depends heavily on adaptability and resourcefulness.

Pro Tip: Forget about “safest”. Focus on survivability. Your skills, resources, and ability to adapt will determine your fate, regardless of location. Stockpile supplies, learn essential skills (first aid, self-defense, foraging), and choose a location based on *your* specific strengths and weaknesses. Good luck, you’ll need it.

How to not be scared of war?

Facing the anxieties triggered by war news can feel like navigating a brutally difficult level in a survival horror game. The constant barrage of information – the relentless stream of headlines, images, and social media updates – is a relentless onslaught, akin to waves of enemies in a relentless horde mode. Your first strategy is to manage the incoming damage. Mute triggering content. Avoid certain keywords, phrases, or even specific news sources that consistently elevate your anxiety. Think of it as equipping protective armor; you’re choosing to mitigate incoming stress.

Next, limit your exposure to news about the war. Don’t completely ignore it, but set specific times for consuming news, treating it like a timed challenge. Avoid binge-watching the news cycle; instead, approach it strategically, gathering essential information in short, controlled bursts. This is about resource management – conserving your mental energy.

Social media can be a double-edged sword. It offers connection, but also amplifies anxiety. Be intentional. Unfollow or mute accounts that consistently post triggering content. Create a safe space online, just like you would meticulously build a base in a survival game to avoid unwanted encounters.

Accepting uncertainty is key. Many games present unpredictable scenarios. In real life, the same applies to the situation. You can’t control everything, just like you can’t predict every enemy spawn. Focus on what you can control: your reactions, your self-care, and your mental health. This involves developing coping mechanisms, much like learning new skills in a game to help you survive.

Finally, prioritize self-care. This isn’t a side quest; it’s the main objective. Exercise, healthy eating, sleep – these are all essential resources. Consider relaxation techniques like meditation or mindfulness; they are like powerful healing items in your arsenal, helping to restore your mental health.

Where is the safest place to be if WW3 starts?

The “safest” location during a hypothetical World War III isn’t a simple geographical point, but rather a strategic profile. Geographically isolated nations with strong self-sufficiency and a history of neutrality significantly improve survivability odds. Think of this as a “risk mitigation” strategy, reducing exposure to direct conflict and supply chain disruptions.

New Zealand, Iceland, and Switzerland consistently rank highly due to their inherent advantages. Their remoteness minimizes the likelihood of direct invasion. Self-sufficiency in food production, energy, and essential resources reduces reliance on potentially compromised global supply chains. Their historical neutrality decreases the probability of becoming entangled in major power conflicts. This isn’t guaranteed safety, but rather a significantly reduced risk profile.

However, “safest” is relative. Even these nations aren’t immune to secondary effects like nuclear fallout (depending on the scale and nature of the conflict), economic shocks, or refugee influxes. The impact of global climate change, potentially exacerbated by conflict, is also a significant wild card affecting even the most isolated regions. Therefore, the analysis should not be interpreted as a guarantee of complete safety, but rather a comparative risk assessment.

Factors like robust civil defense infrastructure, advanced early warning systems, and a stable, well-prepared government also play a crucial, often overlooked, role. These elements are critical for mitigating the impact of any global crisis, including a major war. The overall survivability score is a complex interplay of geographical location, resource availability, political stability, and preparedness – not merely geographical isolation alone.

Why should we avoid war?

Look, kid, war’s a brutal game with no real winners. Think of it like the hardest, most unforgiving campaign you’ve ever faced, except there’s no save point, no respawn. The consequences are catastrophic: societal structures crumble – that’s like having your base systematically destroyed, leaving you vulnerable. Your population? They’re your units, and they suffer immense stress and trauma – imagine crippling morale debuffs affecting *everyone*. Access to healthcare plummets; that’s your supply lines cut, leaving your troops to die of preventable diseases. And the psychopathology and physical morbidity? That’s a permanent negative modifier impacting your entire civilization for generations – collateral damage that far surpasses any initial objective.

It’s not just about the battlefield casualties, the “intended targets.” This is a game where even the bystanders, your non-combatant civilians, suffer crippling debuffs, impacting your long-term prosperity. It’s a lose-lose situation, permanently impacting your civilization’s stats across the board; economy, population growth, and even technological advancement gets severely hindered. So before you even think about engaging, consider the long-term consequences; a protracted conflict will drain your resources and leave you vulnerable to future threats, much like a depleted mana bar makes you a sitting duck for the next boss.

It’s a game you can’t win, only lose. Avoid it at all costs.

What to do if WW3 starts?

WW3? Amateur hour. Forget the “official alerts” nonsense. Those are for the sheep. Here’s the real deal, gleaned from years of navigating the grey areas:

Survival hinges on pre-planning, not reacting. Your “emergency plan” needs to be more than a dusty booklet. It’s a constantly evolving, adaptable strategy.

Location, Location, Location: Forget the “shelter in place” advice unless you’re already in a hardened bunker. Identify multiple escape routes and fallback positions outside of immediate impact zones. Consider geographical factors; high ground, defensible terrain, access to water.
Communication is Key (and Fragile): Official channels will likely be jammed. Have backup communication systems: shortwave radio, satellite phones (if you can afford the exorbitant cost and understand how to use them). Establish a rendezvous point with trusted contacts, *away* from likely targets.
Self-Sufficiency: Stockpile at least 6 months of non-perishable food, water purification tablets/system, medical supplies (including trauma kits), and fuel. Forget relying on “the system”; it’ll collapse quickly.
Security: Learn basic self-defense and survival skills. This isn’t a video game; you’re responsible for your own protection. Acquire weaponry legally and ethically, and learn to use it proficiently. This includes understanding the implications of lethal force.

Beyond the Basics (for the truly seasoned):

Develop a network of trusted individuals: Your survival will be greatly enhanced by collaboration. Find people with complementary skills: medical, technical, security.
Identify potential resources: Know where to find food, water, and fuel outside your immediate stockpile. Think beyond supermarkets; explore abandoned farms, rural areas, etc.
Adapt and improvise: The situation will evolve rapidly. Your plan needs to be flexible enough to adjust to unforeseen circumstances. Expect the unexpected.
Information Warfare: Critically evaluate any information you receive. Official sources are often manipulated; seek corroboration from multiple trustworthy (and possibly unconventional) channels.

Forget the government. Your survival depends on you.

Will an only son be drafted?

So, you’re asking about the draft and only sons? Let’s clear this up. The short answer is: yes, an only son can be drafted.

Contrary to popular belief, being an only son, the last son to carry the family name, or the sole surviving son doesn’t grant an automatic exemption from Selective Service registration or the draft itself.

Here’s the breakdown:

Registration is mandatory: All male U.S. citizens and male immigrants residing in the U.S. who are 18 years old or older are required to register with Selective Service. This includes only sons.
Draft eligibility: Registration doesn’t guarantee you’ll be drafted; it simply makes you eligible. The draft is a complex process with many factors influencing selection, and being an only son isn’t a protective factor.
Exemptions exist, but they’re rare: While there aren’t specific exemptions for only sons, exemptions *do* exist for various reasons, including medical conditions and conscientious objector status. These are assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Key takeaway: Don’t assume your status as an only son protects you. Register with Selective Service if required and understand the process. Researching specific exemption criteria might be worthwhile, but don’t rely on being an only son as a guarantee of exemption.

What stops the war?

Let’s break down how to “beat” the war level, because it’s not as simple as just lowering the health bar. There are several ways to achieve temporary pauses – think of them as different difficulty settings.

Armistice: This is like a temporary truce. It’s a fragile peace, a “pause” button. The weapons are silenced, but the underlying conflict – the core game mechanics – remain active. Think of it as a brief intermission, allowing for resource gathering and strategic redeployment before the main battle resumes. It’s often used to negotiate better terms later, allowing for a better score in the final peace settlement.
Surrender: This is a full defeat for one side. It’s a “game over” for the surrendering player, often with significant penalties in the aftermath. While the fighting stops, the war is officially over for that player – they leave the game. They lose resources and often face long-term disadvantages. It’s a risky move; consider carefully if you lack the resources to fight back.
Ceasefire: Somewhere between an armistice and a surrender. It’s a more structured pause, often with agreed-upon terms, but it doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the conflict. It could be a crucial stepping stone to a peace treaty, a way to lower the difficulty and stabilise the situation before a final push. Think of it as achieving a temporary advantage; it buys you time to work towards a better outcome but doesn’t guarantee victory.

The ultimate victory: the Peace Treaty. This is the only way to truly “win” the war level. It’s the equivalent of completing the game – a lasting resolution that ends the state of war completely. It requires careful negotiation and strategic gameplay, much more than just silencing the weapons.

Successfully navigating armistices and ceasefires increases your chances of achieving a favourable peace treaty.
Remember, a surrender is a last resort, often resulting in severe long-term consequences.
Focus on the endgame goal: securing a lasting peace through a peace treaty, not just achieving temporary silences in combat.

Can you refuse going to war?

So, you’re asking about dodging the draft, huh? Think of it like a really tough, high-stakes game with multiple branching paths. There are several “achievements” you can unlock to avoid the front lines.

First, the Conscientious Objector route: This is like finding a hidden questline. If your moral compass is pointing firmly away from combat, you can apply for this status. Think of it as a pacifist playthrough. It won’t get you out of the game entirely; you’ll likely end up in a support role – think medic, supply runner, etc. It’s not exactly a walk in the park, but it’s significantly less dangerous.

Next, the Education Exploit: This is a classic strategy. If you’re still in school, you can defer service. This is like putting the game on hold until you level up your skills. The longer you stay in education, the longer you delay your deployment. Just make sure you actually *are* a student and not trying to pull a fast one.

Finally, the Medical Exemption Glitch: This requires a bit of in-game doctoring (pun intended). A verifiable medical condition can grant you a deferment, essentially a game over for your character in combat scenarios. But be warned: this requires solid evidence. A scraped knee won’t cut it. We’re talking legitimate, documented medical issues here. Think of it as finding a game-breaking bug – if you can exploit it successfully, you’re golden.

In short:

Conscientious Objection: Non-combat roles.
Education Deferment: Delay service until graduation.
Medical Deferment: Requires verifiable medical conditions.

Remember, each of these options has its own set of requirements and challenges. Do your research! This isn’t a game you want to lose.