Do game consoles consume a lot of electricity?

Power consumption is a key consideration for gamers, especially with the arrival of next-gen consoles. The PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series X boast significantly increased power compared to their predecessors, resulting in higher energy demands. While the PS5 and Xbox Series X can draw between 160-200W during intensive gaming sessions, this isn’t necessarily excessive compared to other modern electronics like high-end PCs. For context, the Xbox One consumed approximately 112W, and the PS4 around 137W. This jump reflects the vastly improved graphical capabilities and processing power. To minimize energy usage, consider using energy-saving modes when not actively playing and unplugging the console completely when not in use. Remember that while these power figures are peak usage, actual energy consumption varies based on game complexity and in-game settings.

Think of it this way: the increase in power translates directly to a more immersive gaming experience. Crisper visuals, faster load times, and smoother gameplay all come at the cost of slightly higher electricity bills. It’s a trade-off most gamers are happy to make for enhanced performance, but understanding the energy implications is crucial for budget planning. Comparing this power draw to other household appliances can put the figures into perspective. For example, a typical microwave oven might consume similarly high wattage during use, but for much shorter bursts.

Ultimately, the energy efficiency of your console experience is dependent on your usage habits. Smart power management practices can go a long way in offsetting increased electricity costs. The added performance offered by the PS5 and Xbox Series X is undoubtedly a significant leap forward, and the slightly higher energy draw is a small price to pay for the superior gaming experience they provide.

Which consoles are considered retro?

Retro consoles are no longer just the bulky boxes of yesteryear. Modern multi-functional retro consoles are compact powerhouses, packing in emulators capable of playing a vast library of games. Think 8-bit and 16-bit classics – the golden age of gaming – plus some surprisingly capable 32-bit titles. These miniature marvels often include hundreds of pre-loaded games, saving you the hassle of sourcing cartridges. Some even boast additional features like HDMI output for crisp modern displays, save-state functionality to avoid frustrating restarts, and customizable controller options for enhanced comfort and gameplay.

While specific titles vary between models, expect to find iconic franchises like Super Mario Bros., Sonic the Hedgehog, Street Fighter II, and countless others. These devices offer a fantastic way to relive the magic of retro gaming, and are perfect for both seasoned veterans and newcomers wanting to experience the history of video games.

Consider factors like controller design, game library size, and emulation accuracy when choosing a console. Reading reviews and comparing specs will help you find the perfect retro gaming companion tailored to your preferences.

Can I return this game console to the store?

So, you wanna return your console? Easy peasy, lemon squeezy, *if* it’s faulty. Under the law (we’re talking Section 18 here, folks), you’ve got 15 days to ditch that busted brick. Think joystick drift, disc drive issues, the whole shebang. Within that timeframe, you’re golden – full refund or a shiny new replacement, your pick. Beyond those 15 days? It gets trickier. Warranty usually kicks in then – check your paperwork carefully; manufacturers’ warranties often extend far beyond that initial 15-day window. Know your rights, gamers! Don’t be afraid to fight for your right to a functioning console. Document everything – photos, videos of the problem, even timestamps. The more evidence you have, the smoother the return process will be. This isn’t rocket science, it’s just knowing your consumer rights. Remember, you paid good money for this thing; it should work.

What’s inside a game console?

The Motherboard: Think of this as the console’s brain. It’s got all the important stuff:

CPU (Central Processing Unit): This is the main processor, the muscle that runs the games. Think of it like the console’s brain, responsible for all the calculations and processing that lets you play games. Different consoles have different CPUs, leading to varied performance.
GPU (Graphics Processing Unit): This is crucial for rendering all those amazing graphics. The better the GPU, the smoother and more detailed the visuals. This is often where you see the biggest difference between low-end and high-end systems.
RAM (Random Access Memory): This is your console’s short-term memory. Games use RAM to load and run, and the more RAM, the smoother the gaming experience. The amount of RAM affects game loading speeds and texture quality.
ROM (Read-Only Memory): This stores the console’s operating system and other essential software. Unlike RAM, it retains data even when the console is turned off.

Then you have the media drive – either a cartridge slot (retro!) or a disc drive (Blu-ray or even DVD, depending on the system). That’s how the games get loaded.

Power Supply: This is the brick that plugs into the wall. It converts the AC power from your outlet into the DC power the console needs to operate. You’ll usually find these external to the console these days, improving cooling and portability.

Other key components: You’ll also find various controllers, cooling systems (heat sinks, fans – crucial to prevent overheating!), and various other chips that handle audio, network connectivity (Wi-Fi and Ethernet for online play!), and input/output operations.

Different generations, different guts: Keep in mind that the internal components vary drastically between generations and manufacturers. A modern console is a vastly different beast from a console from 10 or 20 years ago. The technology involved is constantly evolving and improving

How much electricity does a PS5 consume per hour?

The PS5’s power consumption varies significantly depending on usage. During intense gameplay, expect a draw of approximately 200-220W. This can fluctuate based on the game’s graphical demands and the console’s internal processes. Less graphically demanding titles will naturally consume less power.

In rest mode with network connectivity, the power consumption drops dramatically to around 1.5W. However, this “rest mode” allows for features like automatic game updates and stand-by functionality. Disconnecting the console from the network entirely further reduces this to near-zero power draw.

The system’s user interface, or the power consumed while navigating menus, hovers around 47W. This is a relatively low figure compared to active gameplay.

Cost Implications: At a rate of $0.26 per kWh, the hourly operational cost of the PS5 during gameplay is roughly $0.056. This translates to approximately $4.17 a day if played for 75 hours. However, this is a worst-case estimate, assuming maximum power draw consistently. Average usage will likely result in a lower daily cost. Consider optimizing settings such as resolution and frame-rate to lower power consumption for longer gaming sessions.

Further Considerations: The actual power consumption can also be influenced by factors such as ambient temperature and the age and condition of the console’s internal components. Over time, dust accumulation can increase internal temperatures, leading to increased energy demands. Regular cleaning is advisable for optimal performance and energy efficiency.

Does a gaming PC increase electricity bills?

Yeah, so, gaming PCs definitely bump up your electricity bill. It’s not insignificant, especially if you’re rocking a high-end rig and playing for hours on end. Think top-tier GPUs and CPUs – those suckers are power hungry.

Here’s the breakdown:

The components: Your GPU is the biggest culprit. Those intense graphics calculations need serious juice. A high-refresh-rate monitor also draws more power.
The hours: The longer you game, the higher the cost. A marathon League of Legends session or a grueling CS:GO tournament practice will rack up the kilowatt-hours.
Overclocking: Pushing your hardware beyond its stock speeds? Expect even higher energy consumption. It’s a trade-off between performance and cost.

It’s not just about your wallet though. The collective energy usage of millions of gamers adds up to a significant carbon footprint. We need to be mindful of that. Some things to consider:

Energy-efficient components: Look for components with good power efficiency ratings. It’s not just about raw performance, but how efficiently it delivers that performance.
Smart power management: Utilize power-saving modes when not actively gaming. Turn off your PC completely when not in use.
Background processes: Close unnecessary programs while gaming to reduce overhead and power consumption.

Basically, the more powerful your PC, the more it costs to run. It’s a balancing act between performance and power consumption. Knowing this helps make informed choices.

How much electricity does a gaming computer consume in one hour of operation?

Power consumption for a gaming PC is highly variable, depending heavily on components and workload. While idling, a modern system might draw around 140W, a relatively modest figure. However, the story changes dramatically when you fire up demanding games.

High-end games with maxed-out graphics settings can easily push power consumption to 400W or more. This isn’t unusual, and some configurations, especially those with high-end GPUs and CPUs, can even exceed this significantly. Think 500W or even higher in extreme cases.

Several factors contribute to this variance:

Graphics Card (GPU): This is the biggest power hog. High-end GPUs are power-hungry beasts. The more powerful the GPU, the more electricity it consumes.
CPU: The central processing unit also contributes significantly, especially during complex game calculations.
Game Settings: Resolution (4K vs. 1080p), graphical fidelity (ray tracing, shadows, textures), and other in-game settings dramatically impact power draw.
Overclocking: If your CPU or GPU is overclocked, expect higher power consumption.
Background Processes: Running other applications simultaneously will also increase overall power usage.

To get a more precise estimate for your specific system, you can use power monitoring software. These tools give real-time power consumption data, letting you see exactly how much electricity your gaming rig is using under various loads.

Keep in mind that running a system at 400W for an hour translates to a considerable amount of energy consumption over time. Consider this when budgeting for your gaming setup.

How much electricity do video games consume?

A 300W PSU gaming rig? That’s rookie numbers. You’re looking at roughly 2.4 kWh daily at six hours of playtime, but that’s assuming a relatively modest setup. Think of it this way: that’s close to a third of a kilowatt-hour *per hour* of gameplay.

That number’s a baseline. High-end GPUs, overclocking, and demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2? Expect that number to balloon. We’re talking significantly higher power draw, potentially double or even triple depending on the components and settings. Remember, your monitor, peripherals, and even the ambient temperature affect the overall energy consumption.

Consider this: A top-tier rig pushing the limits can easily consume 500-700W under load. That’s a considerable jump in power usage, especially during extended gaming sessions. You’re likely looking at significantly more than 2.4kWh. You might even consider investing in a higher wattage PSU for future upgrades, ensuring you avoid power supply issues. Power supply failures are not fun, trust me on this one.

Monitoring your power usage through software like HWMonitor is crucial. It allows you to track power consumption in real time and optimize your settings for maximum performance while minimizing energy waste. Ignoring this is like showing up to a PvP battle with rusty gear – you’re at a serious disadvantage.

Why do consoles still exist?

Let’s be real, consoles still exist because they offer a curated, optimized experience you just can’t get on a PC. Ease of use is key; plug and play, minimal fuss. No driver issues, no compatibility headaches. You just boot up and game. That’s huge for casual gamers and families.

The whole “convergence” thing? Yeah, that’s true. But it’s more than just multi-platform releases. Consoles benefit from optimized development cycles. While PC gaming sprawls across a thousand different hardware configurations, console devs target a specific, known set of specs. This leads to consistent, polished performance across the board. Think of it as a well-oiled machine versus a Frankenstein’s monster of components.

And the media player aspect? Don’t underestimate that. It’s a solid secondary function. But beyond that, the controller remains a major factor. The gamepad’s tactile feel and intuitive design still can’t be entirely replicated by mouse and keyboard in many genres. Fighting games, platformers, even some RPGs just feel *better* with a controller.

Dedicated hardware: Consoles are built from the ground up for gaming. This allows for specific optimizations that PC’s often lack. Think ray tracing, fast loading times, consistent frame rates, etc.
Online infrastructure: Console online services are often more robust and easier to use than PC counterparts, with less emphasis on tweaking settings and dealing with cheating.
Exclusive titles: Let’s face it, certain games are console exclusives and that’s a big reason some people stick with them. These games often push boundaries, showcasing the power of the hardware.

Finally, let’s not forget the couch co-op experience. Sharing a screen and controller with friends? That’s hard to replicate on separate PC setups.

The controller remains superior for some genres.
Consistent performance trumps the PC’s chaotic hardware landscape.
Exclusive games and curated online services keep gamers loyal.

Is retro 15 years?

The “retro” label isn’t strictly defined by a 15-year timeframe, despite the common misconception. While a 15-year-old item can certainly qualify, the term’s origins trace back to 1972, encompassing the vibrant technological and fashion trends up to the 1990s. Think of it less as a chronological marker and more of an aesthetic. The key lies in evoking a specific nostalgic feeling – the distinctive styles of the 60s, 70s, 80s, and early 90s. This is why a modern game can be considered “retro” if its design intentionally channels the pixel art, gameplay mechanics, or overall vibe of those eras. The gaming industry has seen numerous revivals and reinterpretations of classic styles, from the 8-bit charm of indie titles to meticulously crafted pixel art in AAA games. This inherent flexibility allows for a broad spectrum of games to be labeled retro, focusing on the feeling of yesteryear rather than precise age. The 15-year rule is merely a helpful guideline, not a rigid definition. Ultimately, it boils down to the successful recreation or homage to a past style.

Which console is considered retro?

Defining “retro” gaming is tricky; there’s no official cutoff. However, a good rule of thumb is 15 years or older. This means the line is constantly shifting! What was considered cutting-edge a decade ago is now firmly in retro territory.

This opens up a vast landscape, from the earliest arcade cabinets – think Space Invaders and Pac-Man – to home consoles like the Atari 2600 and the original Nintendo Entertainment System (NES).

But the definition isn’t static. The PlayStation 3 and original Xbox, while still relatively recent compared to those early systems, are increasingly considered retro by many. This is due to several factors including the widespread adoption of digital distribution and the change in game design philosophy. The rise of online services and online multiplayer games changes the experience and accessibility of the older consoles.

Ultimately, what defines “retro” is subjective. It often evokes a sense of nostalgia, associating the hardware and software with a specific period in gaming history. A system’s technological limitations, game design styles, and even the cultural context surrounding its release all contribute to its retro status. So while a 15-year benchmark is useful, the true essence of “retro” lies in the experience and the memories it sparks.

Can I return an opened PlayStation 5?

Listen up, newbie. Want to return your opened PS5? Forget it. Unless you’re a master thief who can perfectly reseal the box and make it look untouched by mortal hands, you’re screwed. The return policy is brutal. Think of it like a Dark Souls boss fight: impossible to beat unless you’re perfectly prepared.

They want everything pristine. Every cable, every tiny piece of paper, even the damn warranty card needs to be in its original, untouched glory. Think of it as finding all the collectibles in a game; missing a single one means game over.

And games? Those physical discs? Yeah, forget about playing them and then trying to return them. Unopened, factory-sealed. Untouched. Untarnished. Like finding that legendary weapon hidden away in a secret area. If it’s opened, you’re facing a boss rush of impossible odds.

Basically, returning an opened PS5 is harder than beating Malenia, Blade of Miquella on a no-hit run. Just keep that in mind before you even think about cracking open that glorious box. It’s a riskier gamble than betting your soul on a one-armed bandit.

What retro console game should I play?

Choosing a PlayStation 1 game can be daunting, given its rich library. Here’s a curated list focusing on critically acclaimed titles, offering more than just Metascores:

Tekken 3 (1998): A fighting game masterpiece with a massive roster, refined mechanics, and a memorable soundtrack. Its 3D graphics were groundbreaking for the time. While the Metascore of 96 is deserved, consider the sheer depth of its gameplay; mastering this game takes considerable time and dedication.
Final Fantasy VII (1997): A JRPG legend that redefined the genre. Its story, characters, and innovative materia system still resonate today. The 92 Metascore doesn’t fully capture its cultural impact. Be warned, the graphics haven’t aged as well as the gameplay.
Gran Turismo 2 (1999): A simulation racing game that set the standard for its time. The sheer number of cars and tracks was staggering, offering unparalleled replayability. The 93 Metascore is well-earned, but note that the handling model might feel dated to modern players.
Vagrant Story (2000): A criminally underrated RPG with a dark, gothic atmosphere, a unique battle system focusing on crafting and strategy, and a compelling narrative. Its 92 Metascore is a testament to its hidden gem status. Be prepared for a challenging experience.
Medal of Honor (1999): A groundbreaking World War II first-person shooter. Its immersive atmosphere and intense gameplay redefined the genre on consoles. The 92 Metascore reflects its importance in gaming history. Gameplay can feel somewhat rigid by today’s standards.
Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver (1999): A gothic action-adventure game with a memorable protagonist and a compelling story that delves into themes of betrayal, redemption, and immortality. It deserves more recognition than its often-overlooked Metascore suggests. Expect a deep and atmospheric experience.
Spyro: Year of the Dragon (2000): A colorful and charming platformer with excellent level design and a wide variety of gameplay mechanics. The enhanced gameplay over the first two Spyro games made it a classic. While lacking a Metascore, its playful nature is a welcome respite from some of the darker titles on this list.
Resident Evil (1996): A survival horror classic that set the tone for the entire genre. Its tense atmosphere, fixed camera angles, and resource management mechanics are still impactful. While lacking a Metascore in this list, its cultural impact is undeniable. The tank controls might be a hurdle for modern players.

Important Note: These scores reflect their reception at the time of release. Consider your personal preferences and tolerance for dated graphics and control schemes when making your selection.

What’s the difference between a game console and a gaming console?

The core difference between a gaming console and a gaming rig lies primarily in their intended social interaction and ease of multiplayer experiences. While a high-end PC offers unparalleled graphical fidelity and customization, consoles prioritize ease of use and readily available multiplayer functionalities.

Console Strengths:

Plug-and-Play Simplicity: Consoles are designed for immediate accessibility. Setup is significantly easier than building or configuring a gaming PC.
Optimized Multiplayer: Manufacturers specifically design consoles to facilitate seamless multiplayer. Connecting multiple controllers is straightforward, and online infrastructure is usually well-established and optimized for competitive and cooperative gaming.
Cost-Effectiveness (for multiplayer): While individual console purchases can be comparable to PC builds, the cost per player in a multiplayer setting is often lower. Sharing a single console amongst multiple players represents a significant cost advantage over individual PC setups.
Dedicated Game Ecosystem: Consoles boast curated game libraries, often with titles specifically designed to leverage the console’s capabilities and social features.

Further Considerations:

Controller Variety: Consoles offer a range of officially supported controllers tailored to different gameplay styles, further enhancing the social experience.
Cross-Platform Play: Increasingly, console manufacturers are incorporating cross-platform features, allowing players on different consoles and even PCs to interact.
Game Pass/PlayStation Plus: Subscription services offer cost-effective access to large game libraries, further boosting the value proposition for social gaming.

In short: Consoles excel in providing a readily accessible, user-friendly, and cost-effective platform for group gaming, making them the ideal choice for social gatherings and competitive multiplayer sessions.

How much power does the PC draw?

PC power consumption varies wildly depending on its components and workload. A typical office PC averages 150-300W. This means an 8-hour workday at 50% load consumes roughly 1.2-2.4 kWh daily. However, this is a broad generalization.

Factors Affecting Power Consumption:

• CPU: High-end CPUs consume significantly more power than low-power options. Look for TDP (Thermal Design Power) ratings to compare power efficiency.

• GPU: Gaming or professional graphics cards are major power consumers, especially under heavy load. Consider power requirements carefully when choosing a GPU.

• RAM: While RAM’s power draw is relatively low, it still adds to the overall consumption. Faster RAM might consume slightly more.

• Storage: SSDs generally consume less power than HDDs, especially when idle.

• Peripherals: Monitors, keyboards, mice, and other peripherals all draw power. High-resolution monitors, especially, consume more.

• Background Processes: Running multiple applications simultaneously, especially demanding ones, increases power draw significantly.

• Overclocking: Overclocking components boosts performance but dramatically increases power consumption and heat generation.

Calculating Your PC’s Power Consumption:

Many power supply units (PSUs) include power meters, either built-in or as an external monitoring tool. These provide real-time power usage data. Alternatively, you can use power monitoring software to track consumption.

Power Saving Tips:

• Lower screen brightness: Reduces monitor power draw.

• Enable power-saving modes: Windows and other operating systems offer power management settings to optimize consumption.

• Close unnecessary applications: Reduces background processes.

• Use sleep or hibernation: Conserves energy when the PC is not actively used.

Knowing your PC’s power draw helps in estimating energy costs and choosing energy-efficient components. Accurate measurement is key to optimization.

Does the PS5 increase electricity bills?

The PlayStation 5’s power consumption is a significant factor affecting electricity bills, especially for competitive gamers with extensive playtime. While the exact increase depends heavily on usage patterns (game type, screen resolution, and peripheral use), it’s demonstrably higher than previous generations.

Power Consumption Breakdown:

Gaming: Expect a power draw ranging from 150W to 200W during intensive gameplay, leading to considerably higher energy use compared to a PS4.
Rest Mode: Even in rest mode, the PS5 consumes a notable amount of power for automatic updates and standby features. This should be considered a low-level but continuous drain.
Peripherals: Additional peripherals like charging controllers and external drives further contribute to overall energy consumption.

Impact on Electricity Bills: The financial implications vary depending on electricity prices and gameplay hours. For a hardcore gamer averaging 5 hours of daily play, the added cost can be noticeable, potentially ranging from a few dollars to upwards of $20 per month, depending on local energy rates. This makes energy efficiency an important consideration.

Strategies for Mitigation:

Optimize Game Settings: Lowering graphical settings like resolution and frame rate significantly reduces energy consumption without severely impacting gameplay for many titles.
Limit Rest Mode Use: Completely powering down the console when not in use is a far more energy-efficient approach than relying on rest mode.
Smart Power Strips: Utilizing smart power strips allows for complete control and efficient power management for all connected devices.
Efficient Cooling: Ensuring proper ventilation minimizes the console’s need to work harder to maintain optimal operating temperatures, thus decreasing energy usage.

Competitive Edge: While the increase in electricity cost is a legitimate concern, professionals must balance this against maintaining optimal performance. Factors like consistent frame rates and quick loading times, often requiring higher power settings, can be crucial in competitive gaming, offsetting the cost.

What is the worst console?

The “worst console ever” is a subjective question, but some consistently rank poorly due to a combination of factors. Let’s dive into a detailed breakdown of some notorious contenders, ranked from least to most disastrous. This is crucial knowledge for any serious gaming history buff!

Philips CD-i: The infamous home of Zelda: CD-i and its bizarre, low-quality library. Its poor game selection, awkward controller, and generally underwhelming experience cemented its place in gaming infamy. Key failure points included: ridiculously expensive games, a lack of compelling titles, and its unwieldy interface.
Atari Jaguar: While boasting impressive (for its time) technical specs, the Jaguar suffered from a lack of compelling software and high price point. The difficult programming environment also hampered developer adoption, resulting in a relatively small and underwhelming game library. Its advanced architecture was ultimately its downfall – too complex for most developers and ultimately, too little, too late in the console war.
R-Zone: This handheld was ahead of its time in attempting to combine gaming with a mobile phone, but it suffered from extremely poor build quality, short battery life, and a small library of mediocre games. It was practically forgotten before it hit the market. A truly tragic tale of ambition outweighing execution.
Virtual Boy: Nintendo’s ill-fated foray into 3D gaming left users with headaches and motion sickness thanks to its monochrome, bulky design and uncomfortable viewing angle. The limited library was also a massive contributor to its failure. A classic example of a fascinating concept failing spectacularly on execution.
Sega Saturn: Despite its impressive technical capabilities, a convoluted architecture, challenging development process and poor marketing strategy led to limited game support and ultimately, its defeat in the console wars against the PlayStation. It had some amazing titles, but the overall experience was plagued by lack of widespread adoption.
3DO Interactive Multiplayer: Another victim of high price and a limited game selection, the 3DO suffered from its early adoption of CD-ROM technology, which proved difficult and expensive for developers at the time. It attempted to be too technologically advanced for its era.
Gizmondo: More than just a bad console, the Gizmondo was involved in a major scandal, with its creator facing numerous charges related to fraud and money laundering. The game library was paltry and the device itself was notoriously unreliable.
N-Gage: Nokia’s attempt to enter the gaming market was hampered by its awkward clamshell design, which made it uncomfortable to play and difficult to access the game cartridge. It also suffered from a limited game selection and poor marketing. A painful reminder that even established tech giants can misjudge the market.

Important Note: While these consoles are generally considered to be among the worst, their failures often provide valuable lessons in game design, marketing, and technology. Each console’s story contributes to a richer understanding of the gaming industry’s evolution.

What games were available on the PS1?

So, you wanna know what games were on the original PlayStation? Man, where do I even begin? That console was a beast. Let’s run down some absolute classics:

Ridge Racer (1994): The game that practically defined the launch. Simple, yet addictive arcade racer. The polygon count was revolutionary for the time, even if the textures were… well, let’s just say “blocky”.
Tekken (1994): Another launch title that set the 3D fighting game standard. The impact of this game on the genre can’t be overstated. Learn the combos, and you were a god.
wipEout (1995): Futuristic anti-gravity racing at its finest. The soundtrack alone is worth revisiting. This game was visually stunning, even by today’s standards – in a “retro-futuristic” sort of way.
Tomb Raider (1996): Lara Croft. Need I say more? This game popularized the action-adventure genre, and Lara became an icon. The controls were a bit clunky by today’s standards, but the atmosphere and level design were groundbreaking.
PaRappa the Rapper (1996): A rhythm game unlike anything else at the time. Simple yet addictive gameplay with a killer soundtrack. This was pure, unadulterated fun.
Resident Evil (1996): Survival horror redefined. Tank controls? Yeah, they were awkward. Fixed camera angles? They ramped up the tension. But the atmosphere, the scares… this game is still terrifying today.
Crash Bandicoot (1996): The mascot platformer that rivaled Mario. The gameplay was tight, the levels were inventive, and the character design was memorable. A true PlayStation icon.
Final Fantasy VII (1997): This game needs no introduction. A JRPG masterpiece that changed the landscape of the genre forever. The story, the characters, the soundtrack… it’s a classic for a reason. Be prepared for a long journey though!

And that’s just scratching the surface. There were so many more incredible games on the PS1. This was a golden age for gaming.